There is no denying that, in 2025, chaos engineering and the tools built for it, have matured. What started as a niche practice is now critical to how modern teams build confidence in distributed systems. But the tooling landscape can still feel noisy. Plenty of options claim to support chaos testing, but not all are built for real teams shipping production code.
Here’s a breakdown of the top tools in the space right now, what they’re good at, and what you should know before you pick one.
Steadybit focuses on making chaos engineering practical, repeatable, and safe across distributed systems. It’s designed for platform and reliability teams working in complex, multi-team environments.
What makes Steadybit stand out is how it fits into existing workflows. You don’t have to convince your team to learn a new language or switch to a new platform. It works where you already are.
Best for: Engineering teams who want to scale resilience testing without adding friction.
“With Steadybit, we identified issues and corrective measures, improving our overall system resilience. The efficiency of finding these weak spots has vastly increased with Steadybit, and the time to deliver a solution has significantly decreased. We’re moving closer to achieving our target of 99.99% uptime.”
Krishna Palati
Director of Software Engineering
ChaosMesh is a CNCF open source project focused on injecting faults into Kubernetes environments. It’s powerful but assumes your team is already deep in the K8s ecosystem.
Best for: SREs running complex Kubernetes clusters who want flexibility and control.
Litmus comes with a hub of predefined experiments and integrates cleanly with CI/CD pipelines. It’s well suited to teams that want to bake chaos into their daily workflows.
Best for: DevOps teams that want to bring chaos testing into GitOps or pipeline-driven environments.
ToxiProxy is a low-level open source tool that simulates network conditions between services. It’s often used in development and testing environments to verify behavior under failure.
Best for: Developers building fault-tolerant apps who need precise control over traffic behavior.
ChaosBlade is Alibaba’s open source chaos tool. It focuses on host-level and container-level fault injection. It’s quick to get running and simple to use.
Best for: Engineers who want to try chaos testing without setting up a full platform.
Gremlin was one of the first chaos platforms on the market. It helped shape the category and brought awareness to chaos engineering in production.
Best for: Teams in highly structured enterprise environments with traditional release cycles.
FIS is useful if your infrastructure is entirely within AWS and you want to run targeted failure scenarios. It integrates with IAM and CloudWatch, but has limited support outside the AWS ecosystem.
Best for: Teams operating fully inside AWS who want cloud-native testing.
Harness offers a chaos module that integrates with the broader Harness ecosystem. It’s aimed at enterprise DevOps teams that already use Harness for deployment.
Best for: Enterprise teams already using Harness who want a bundled solution.
Start with where your team is today. The best tool is the one that fits your environment and actually gets used.