Do you have defined resource limits for your Kubernetes resources? We hope so! Learn in this post if they are correctly defined and Kubernetes does the expected things when they are reached.
For the hands-on part of this post, you need the following:
The two most important resources used by any software are CPU and memory. In today’s world of software engineering using cloud computing these seem to be unlimited available resources as application developers usually don’t need to care too much about them.
Even so, at some point software meets the physical computer where it is executed. Looking at one physical computer these resources are in fact limited. The worst case would be an unlimited consumption of one application affecting other applications running on the same computer. Thanks to Kubernetes we can limit available resources per application by using resource limits. Having defined resource limits per Kubernetes pods prevents side effects of one pod having e.g. a memory leak and affecting pods running on the same node negatively.
Let’s discover the difference in this blog post by using Steadybit.
Since the number of pods can change dynamically at any time and the total number of components in a distributed system continues to increase from an architectural perspective (keyword: microservices), it also becomes increasingly difficult to monitor and control resource consumption.
But for now, let’s do an experiment and see what happens if we suddenly increase CPU consumption a lot for a pod.
As a target we select the fashion-bestseller service, which currently has no defined resource limits:
We select both pods as blast radius:
And let the CPU consumption increase to 80% for 30 seconds. We simulate a scenario here that often occurs in distributed systems, e.g. because faulty code was deployed with a code bug or similar which leads to an increased CPU consumption.
During the experiment, we observe the CPU usage of the fashion-bestseller
pod with watch kubectl top pods -n steadybit-demo
.
NAME CPU(cores) MEMORY(bytes) fashion-bestseller-fcdbf8776-dgq54 3072m 238Mi gateway-684d55cd4b-55zk8 1m 321Mi hot-deals-6b78f59ccc-2w5dw 2m 270Mi toys-bestseller-79f56b469b-8tv8r 2m 254Mi
As expected, up to 3 CPUs are used by the pod during the experiment. In our demo scenario, of course, this does not have far-reaching effects, but in a productive environment, all other pods on the same node might also have problems if they have to perform CPU-intensive tasks at the same time.
In the next step, we want to check how the pod behaves when there is a defined resource limit. The following example shows the definition of CPU and memory limits in Kubernetes:
apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: namespace: steadybit-demo labels: run: fashion-bestseller name: fashion-bestseller spec: replicas: 1 selector: matchLabels: run: fashion-bestseller-exposed template: metadata: labels: run: fashion-bestseller-exposed spec: serviceAccountName: steadybit-demo containers: - image: steadybit/bestseller-fashion resources: requests: memory: "256Mi" cpu: "250m" limits: memory: "2048Mi" cpu: "750m" imagePullPolicy: Always name: fashion-bestseller ports: - containerPort: 8082 protocol: TCP
See here the full manifest. In this example, the container of the pod has a request of 0.25 CPU and 256 MiB of memory, and a limit of 0,75 CPU and 2048 MiB of memory.
Now let’s see if the set CPU limit really takes effect when we run the experiment again. The command watch kubectl top pods -n steadybit-demo
shows that Kubernetes correctly limits CPU consumption:
NAME CPU(cores) MEMORY(bytes) fashion-bestseller-6477f88986-vrstg 747m 217Mi gateway-684d55cd4b-55zk8 2m 322Mi hot-deals-6b78f59ccc-2w5dw 2m 268Mi toys-bestseller-79f56b469b-8tv8r 2m 257Mi
The above experiment has shown that missing resource limits can lead to uncontrolled behavior and undesired side effects in a distributed system. It is therefore always recommended to define such limits. With the help of experiments, not only the presence and correct functionality should be checked, but also the continued correct functionality of the overall application while increased CPU consumption occurs.
Steadybit can not only help to perform these experiments, but also offers diagnostic functions in advance to detect missing resource limits at an early stage. The tool offers so-called state checks to continuously check if the overall system is still working. Contact us for a demo.
Cookies simplify provisioning of our services. By using our services,
you agree that we use cookies. Further information.
Show Cookies